|
|
|
|
| |
Says the migrant who lives in a country that arrests people for speech.
That said, the story sounds fishy, and since they don't name the person who was rejected, I have my doubts. You are telling me that these officials took the time to look into his phone or computer to find something? And it's the French government saying all of this? I also like how in your link, the guy accuses the American media of not wanting to cover it...you know, the same media that hates Trump? So, are you in agreement with this X user that our media is fake news?
I'll follow up on this in a few hours to see if a real article pops up with some real information. I'm sure there's more to it, but we'll never know, and you wouldn't believe it. | |
|
Reply to message
|
mmarino51589 Super Regular Soldier Flag Defense
|  | P: | 03/20/2025 08:51 EST |
| |
PTA, no logic to be had with X
he calls anything Tesla "nazism", yet he proudly owns a car from a brand that had actual ties and involvement with the nazi regime in the 1930's and 1940's
but he won't even talk about that, because his brain can't comprehend the hypocrisy
of course if you google "french researcher phone confiscated", the entirety of the results are
dailymail theindependent theguardian NDTV
so a mix of unreliable sources, compounded with being european sources
nothing from
cnn fox msnbc nbc cbs abc
any other major media outlet in the US (regardless of reliability/bias)
and of course, with not a lot of details
i wonder how much time he spends liking other peoples comments and posts in echo chamber groups across facebook/X | |
|
Reply to message
|
-X- Super Regular Evil Medic
|  | P: | 03/21/2025 09:54 EST | E: | 03/20/2025 22:45 EST |
| |
Reply to message
|
mmarino51589 Super Regular Soldier Flag Defense
|  | P: | 03/21/2025 10:13 EST |
| |
 | “The French researcher in question was in possession of confidential information on his electronic device from Los Alamos National Laboratory — in violation of a non-disclosure agreement — something he admitted to taking without permission and attempted to conceal,” she said. |  | i guess reading past the headline isn't your strong suit | |
|
Reply to message
|
| |
So, you claim we're in the echo chamber, but you're posting links to your echo chamber. There is still no credible information in the articles if the researcher remains unnamed, and we're supposed to take the word of some French diplomat who hates Trump and the US anyway.
Pics (proof) or it didn't happen. Philippe Baptiste, utilizing anonymous sources and an unnamed researcher, gives no validity to the claim. Even your precious left leaning Snopes can't confirm it.
But, go ahead, pop off...such a gotcha moment for you. | |
|
Reply to message
|
| |
 | mmarino51589 wrote:
 | “The French researcher in question was in possession of confidential information on his electronic device from Los Alamos National Laboratory — in violation of a non-disclosure agreement — something he admitted to taking without permission and attempted to conceal,” she said. |  | i guess reading past the headline isn't your strong suit |  | Hard to get past the headline while standing in line for his turn at the 13 year old... | |
|
Reply to message
|
| |
we're sitting here complaining about trump and musk because people that think like you lost hard to trump ROFL
| |
|
Reply to message
|
| |
I like how they stopped caring about the environment and are torching Tesla's now. That HAS to be amazing for the environment. Plus, that's totally the same as boycotting Bud Light or Target...totally.
Next, they're going to completely turn against EV's, and 'green' energy because of Musk.
No wonder democrats are hovering around a 27% approval rating.
| |
|
Reply to message
|
-X- Super Regular Evil Medic
|  | P: | 03/22/2025 02:06 EST |
| |
A couple of jews torched some Teslas and suddenly everyone stopped caring about the environment. MAGA Logic. | |
|
Reply to message
|
| |
That's right, Ilhan....some people did something.
"We don't Elon, so we're going to destroy property that is owned by a private party" - liberal 'peace and love' logic.
This is why they sit at 27% and falling... | |
|
Reply to message
|
fred Super Regular Killer Scout Supreme
|  | P: | 03/22/2025 08:43 EST |
| |
Reply to message
|
| |
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5207343-dhs-deni... Oh no...it looks like the French used the media to get their lie out there so that other media outlets would pick it up and all the morons would just run with it....and then the other side of the coin turns up.
Looks like the researcher was up to no good. I don't care for the 4th amendment being violated, but since he's not a US citizen, fuck him. | |
|
Reply to message
|
| |
You're a cop and have been for years. You should know that there are certain parts of the Constitution that apply to non-citizens (documented or not) as well as citizens.
As a civilian, I'm not sure which ones apply which way, being honest... but YOU should.
To be fair, though... "Civil Asset Forfeiture" has been challenged as a violation of the 4th Amendment.... yet still remains valid but dealt with on a case by case basis. | |
|
Reply to message
|
XenOz3r0xT Super Regular Shotgun Quick Draw
| P: | 03/23/2025 14:08 EST |
| |
This thread makes gaba want to seek therapy. | |
|
Reply to message
|
DynOmiTe! Super Regular Deadly Dispenser Man
| P: | 03/23/2025 16:34 EST |
| |
 | Ignorant_Florist wrote: You're a cop and have been for years. You should know that there are certain parts of the Constitution that apply to non-citizens (documented or not) as well as citizens.
As a civilian, I'm not sure which ones apply which way, being honest... but YOU should.
To be fair, though... "Civil Asset Forfeiture" has been challenged as a violation of the 4th Amendment.... yet still remains valid but dealt with on a case by case basis. |  | The 4th Amendment is literally the bedrock of policing. You deal with search and seizure daily and it applies to ANYONE within the United States. You also swear an oath to it when you get your badge. Stunning to advocate for it being abrogated.
That being said, I think the involved party was contacted at a port of entry from a flight where there are 4th Amendment exceptions.
| |
|
Reply to message
|
|
Forums > Whiners Corner > Trump 2.0 |